
Agriculture is the main cause of the environmental impact, and one of them is the water source. In Cowspiracy movie, The Sustainability Secret; Kip Andersen, who is a leader in the environment and also is the main character in the film. He tries to find some evidence to show to the world how bad animal agriculture is. He reveals the most harmful industry facing the planet today. One of the important Kip Andersen present in the film was water resources. Water is one of the main things we need to survive. Even though we know a lot of people need fresh water to use, we still waste it. Some people take shower more than twice or sometimes they forget to turn off the water when they used it. However, it is not the main problem leading to water sources problem, the main problem is agriculture. There are some good details in the film to show how agriculture waste too much water. Agriculture consumes one-third of freshwater and ten thousand gallons of water use for one animal life per day. It is unable to know how many gallons of water used for agriculture per day because there is a huge animal in the world. Besides that, one gallon of milk equals a thousand gallons of water, but is milk improve our bone? Nestle, a professor in both the Department of Nutrition, Food Studies, and Public Health and Department of Sociology at New York University. In her article, "Eating Made Simple" she writes that" Think of cows: they do not drink milk after weaning, but their bones support bodies weighing eight- hundred pounds or more" (42). This evidence shows that we used too much water for animals and produce milk, but those things we don't need for survival.
People understand how climate change destroys the world and how difficult it is for people to rebuild things after a flood or forest fire. However, climate change is leading to hunger as well. When floods or hurricanes occur, everything is destroyed, including crops and animals. Also, the price of the production of food will increase terribly. Therefore, the people who are low or the lowest classes won’t be able to buy food and hunger will be increased. "The number of people risk of hunger is projected to increase by 10-20% by 2050 as consequence of climate change" (Parry) (14). That's evidence supports how climate change leading to hunger.
When we search on Google about agriculture, we could see most of the websites write about the benefits of agriculture as increasing food products or give more opportunities for the worker. According to Green Garage website, it show that, "Since farmers can use larger areas of farmlands, potential farm workers will be given jobs easily because of the need for more help in the fields," and "Since production costs of conventional farming are low, farmers will be
able to produce more crops and as a result." However, Foley explains, “Agriculture already consumes a large percentage of the earth’s surface and is destroying habitat, using up freshwater, polluting rivers and oceans" Foley (297-298). By that evidence, we can see how agriculture destroys the world and how those websites hiding the cons of agriculture. Even though they are true, they should write the cons of agriculture as well to let people know and aware of that.
We claim that the main thing leads to hunger because of overpopulation. However, it is not an overpopulation issue, it is agriculture issue. In the Cowspiracy movie show, Thirty- seven thousand Ibs of vegetables equal three hundred seventy- five Ibs of meat, and it is more than a trillion of farming or industrial farming in the entire world. How can we calculate how many vegetables we used for animal feed? It is not okay to keep the way we used vegetable source. While we cut the lung of the world to grow crops, but we used the crop to feed the animals. “35 percent [world’s crops] is used for animal feed” Foley (299). That’s evidence shows we wasted a lot of crops to feed the animal. We know that many people need those crops to live, but why we don’t use it to feed humans? While in Africa, more than a billion people die because they don't have food to eat, we used food to feed the animal. Even though we used crops to feed the animal and we increasing the animal products, do we need to meat?
Image from DAILY SABAH WITH DPA
According to Singer, who studied philosophy in college and received his master's degree, and a professor of Bioethics at Princeton University. He writes that " Meat is not necessary for good health or longevity" and "humans can live healthy lives without eating any animal products at all" (212). That evidence supports that meat does not help our health, we eat it because "Their flesh is a luxury, consumed because people like its taste" (212).
We must think about how we can keep doing agriculture, but also can ending hunger or less impact on the environment. It is impossible to change the way people do agriculture, but they should think about how agriculture impact people or their life as well. As a customer, we should change our diet. We must eat less meat, and eat more vegetables or fruit. Even though it hard to change our habits, we must change it. Also, we could prepare our own food, reduce food waste, and stop wasting food.
Image from Leah Douglas ,Ciara Nugent.
https://time.com/5735388/climate-change-eco-anxiety/
https://www.motherjones.com/environment/2018/03/large-scale-animal-agriculture-is-threatening-rural-communities-congress-is-about-to-make-it-worse/
https://phys.org/news/2019-03-ipcc-underselling-climate.html